good horses getting "lost" in a big trainer's stab

General on-topic discussion.

Moderators: Roguelet, hpkingjr, WaveMaster

User avatar
Toccet02
Leading Sire
Posts: 3649
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:00 am
Location: New York City

good horses getting "lost" in a big trainer's stab

Postby Toccet02 » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:11 pm

How often does this actually happen? Does it happen unless one pushes the trainer? Or do the big trainers have enough assistants to mind the non graded stakes winners? I know of a horse who was supposed to train up to a race this week; had only one published workout in about 4 weeks, AFTER a dull effort that the trainer blamed on "not being in good enough condition". The race "didn't go", but the updates on the possible start were very late in coming. Experiences welcome.
All shouting does is make you lose your voice.
----Arrested Development

User avatar
Sysonby
Breeder's Cup Contender
Posts: 1755
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:27 pm
Location: California

Postby Sysonby » Sun Sep 06, 2009 3:02 pm

Not only can you get lost, a small owner in a big stable may have get opportunities in the condition book that are shoved aside to cater to a bigger client.

User avatar
winds
Breeder's Cup Contender
Posts: 1765
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 7:04 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby winds » Sun Sep 06, 2009 3:35 pm

I agree totally.

winds

ageecee
Breeder's Cup Contender
Posts: 1956
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:18 am
Location: Louisiana

Postby ageecee » Sun Sep 06, 2009 3:56 pm

Small owners always get pushed to the side. And that includes knowing when your horse will work, when it will run, etc, etc. You probably have to stay on top of things when your a small owner more than a big owner. Also depends on who the trainer is.

Rachel Alexandra
2yo Maiden
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 5:30 am

Postby Rachel Alexandra » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:31 am

Big trainers are less likely to spend a lot of time on a late bloomer. They want to see results quickly and since they have more waiting in the wings, they are less likely to spend time on a horse that shows no promise early on.
Small owners are only hurting themselves being with a big trainer. Small owners are expendable to the big trainer and where they lose one they will pick up two.

User avatar
winds
Breeder's Cup Contender
Posts: 1765
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 7:04 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby winds » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:49 am

I managed a farm in NVA that had 2 stake horses with a trainer, and was one of the first owners for that trainer. But after training an eclipse award winner he got big and didn't pay attention to his smaller owners, even though they had stake horses. If I hadn't managed their careers, they wouldn't have done what they did. Though I did lose some battles regarding putting them in some races they did ok, but I had to fight for everything I wanted.

winds

louis finochio
Darley line
Posts: 9181
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 5:21 am
Location: Alhambra-Calif.
Contact:

Postby louis finochio » Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:21 am

John Sadler has 80 tbs at DM, 80 more at SA, we are the best of friends, over 30 years friendship. The help on the backstretch has changed over the years, from professional to non-professional.

JS has a few of his old pro help still there, that teach the novices how to put on a bandage etc. JS tbs that are stabled at SA, have won 9 races at DM.

JS is not a one size fits all trainer, if a tb is by Alphabet Soup, a late bloomer, JS will not burn it out a 2. JS will wait on those types of tbs, until they are mature to go on with them.

Thats why JS will always be among the leading trainers. An owner must select a trainer that fits his tb.
Those without sin cast the first stone.
Louis Finochio

reese
Maiden Special Weight
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 5:18 pm
Location: ny

Postby reese » Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:31 pm

I think Godolphin has this problem.
They often have "50 promising 2 -year olds".
If a horse has alot of potential, but "doesn't do well as one of a crowd" then the horse falls by the way side, and may never reach his potential. Some horses need "individual attention" in their training.

I recall reading about a SC foal named Hayabeb..a poster "blogged about him when he visited Taylor Made and saw him as a weanling, then a yearling. Said, "he was the boss of his little herd in the paddock and a perfect specimen". Feisty, self assured, and loved to race around his paddock.

Hayabeb was bought by one of the sheikhs and wisked off to Dubai (as a 2-yr old, I believe) He returned to the US and could only win a few lower level races.

There was no reason this horse with his pedigree... couldn't be a better racer. Maybe off to Dubai as one of 50/75 young horses, Hayabeb couldn't get with the program and flunked out.

For example, MTB and SB...anyone believe MTB would have had the career he has if he was with Pletcher or some other trainer with 200+ horses?

I think not only are smaller owners at the "mercy of SOME big training outfits, but I think some horses might be "stars" if they were with "low-profile barns'.