Postby geowarrior » Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:28 pm
The 'sire of sires' factor is certainly an unknown with a son of Birdstone. However, although Summer Bird has inherited the racing talent and distance capabilities of his sire, he does not look at all like his sire in that he seems (from my crummy t.v.) to be larger and is a nice chestnut. I'd be interested in hearing thoughts on his conformation from anyone who has had a chance to see him up close. I'm no genetics buff, but I see no reason why we would expect Summer Bird to throw offspring that look like Birdstone to the exclusion of other possible 'looks' for the progeny.
He has a nice broodmare sire in Summer Squall, and his female family goes back to Moon Glitter, full sister to Relaunch. Other good sires have this female family also.
Add all this to his excellent race record and I think you have a package that will, at least initially, allow Summer Bird to be priced higher than Birdstone. Birdstone's looks and size and the fact that he does stamp some of his offspring with the small plain brown wrapper appearance (example - Mine That Bird) are likely to keep his sales average relatively low, even though his mares have been of lower quality so far in comparison with other standout sires of his group (e.g. Medaglia d'Oro and Tapit) and the racing exploits of his upcoming progeny would be expected to improve with the likely improved quality of future mares. Birdstone, if the promise of the early crops is fulfilled, will reach a level suitable for a very good breed to race sire.
My biggest concern with Birdstone is that he seems to get runners for conventional dirt only. I would hope for greater versatility from Summer Bird, and if he stamps his offspring with his looks, as well as his racing ability then it's possible that he could outstrip Birdstone permanently in terms of stud fee (i.e. when the vagaries of market vs. brand new sires settles down) within a few years.