Breeders Cup Juv. Sprint --- the right distance?

General racing discussion.

Moderators: Roguelet, hpkingjr, WaveMaster

User avatar
Jorge
Moderator
Posts: 6234
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:48 pm

Breeders Cup Juv. Sprint --- the right distance?

Postby Jorge » Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:53 am

Do you agree that the newly created Breeders Cup Juvenile Sprint should be run at 6 furlongs (same distance as the Breeders Cup Sprint for older horses) rather than 5 furlongs or 5-1/2 furlongs?

Pros and Cons about 6 furlongs at this stage of their careers.

Thanks for your opinions.

endspurt stables
2yo Maiden
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:13 am

Postby endspurt stables » Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:14 am

The distance is okay; they should not have reduced the purse of the Sprint though.

LB
Eclipse Champion
Posts: 2388
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:57 am
Location: Kentucky

Postby LB » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:20 pm

Six furlongs is what it should be if they're going to have a sprint.

The other BC races for 2 year olds are run at a mile (turf) and a mile and a sixteenth (dirt).

Georgerz
Breeder's Cup Contender
Posts: 1754
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: Maple Valley, Washington

Postby Georgerz » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:52 pm

I'd rather had the race at 5 furlongs, on the grass. but it's all decided, no point to argue.

Dave C
Restricted Stakes Winner
Posts: 812
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:25 pm

Postby Dave C » Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:40 pm

And now we can have a whole new group of speedballs who win one race at 2 and retire to stud for the next breeding season because they're broken down.

Crystal
Freshman Sire
Posts: 2799
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:58 pm
Location: Lexington, KY

Postby Crystal » Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:59 pm

agree with Dave.

User avatar
FOS
Freshman Sire
Posts: 2816
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 1:44 pm

Re: Breeders Cup Juv. Sprint --- the right distance?

Postby FOS » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:08 pm

hi Jorge

Jorge wrote:Do you agree that the newly created Breeders Cup Juvenile Sprint should be run at 6 furlongs (same distance as the Breeders Cup Sprint for older horses) rather than 5 furlongs or 5-1/2 furlongs?

Wouldn't it have been interesting if the BC Sprint (as we've known it for years and years) was opened up to accept 2-year-olds? Bottom line...if a 2yo beat all comers of all ages in a 2-yos and up BC Sprint...an eclipse for champion 2yo would (arguably anyway) be very possible for the winner.

That said...if a BC Juvenile Sprint at 5 1/2 or 6 furlongs was offered, likely the winner of that race would have difficulty garnering enough votes to be awarded 2-yo eclipse honors. Why? Seems (to me anyway) that a BC Juvenile winner would, more likely than not, trump (from a voters perspective anyway) a BC Juvenile Sprint winner whether the juvenile sprint was run at 5 1/2 or 6 furlongs.

Who knows...maybe a new eclipse category will be announced...2-year-old sprinter :roll: . Oh well.

Best to ya.

Thoughts?

User avatar
bdw0617
Darley line
Posts: 9206
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:19 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Postby bdw0617 » Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:02 pm

this is just horrible. why take funds out of the breeders cup sprint to fund this crap.

I don't think it should be shorter. I think a 5F race between the fastest 2YO's in the world at that time of year does more harm than good.
"When the solution is simple, God is answering.”
- Einstein