Breeder's Cup Permanently at Santa Anita?

General racing discussion.

Moderators: Roguelet, hpkingjr, WaveMaster

User avatar
madelyn
Moderator
Posts: 10067
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 1:53 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Breeder's Cup Permanently at Santa Anita?

Postby madelyn » Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:38 am

http://www.paulickreport.com/blog/the-c ... -cali-cup/

Right now it looks like moving in that direction. If so, I, for one, will probably never nominate another horse. Comments from the racing folks out there?
So Run for the Roses, as fast as you can.....

justinnich
Maiden Special Weight
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:54 pm

Postby justinnich » Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:12 am

I don't get it when you can move it around to keep the sport relevant in all parts of the country. It was nice even seeing it at Monmouth a couple of years ago, and Lone Star was in there too recently if I remember right. Seems stupid to me to pass up that opportunity.

At least SA may well be back on dirt soon.

LB
Eclipse Champion
Posts: 2388
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:57 am
Location: Kentucky

Postby LB » Tue Mar 30, 2010 9:19 am

I hate the idea of having the Breeders Cup only take place at one track. Especially one with an uncertain surface.

But quite frankly I'd be more likely to stop nominating if the BC pulled their financial support from the stakes races that take place throughout the year as they threatened to do in 2008.

KBEquine
Grade III Winner
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 12:12 pm

Postby KBEquine » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:26 pm

LB wrote:I hate the idea of having the Breeders Cup only take place at one track. Especially one with an uncertain surface.

But quite frankly I'd be more likely to stop nominating if the BC pulled their financial support from the stakes races that take place throughout the year as they threatened to do in 2008.


Between the Breeder's Cup deciding to stop supporting the regional stakes (then rescinding the decision with a fairly huffy, "Well, we didn't know you cared about those races that much" explanation) & wanting to move to a single track with a mediocre surface that is far removed from many of racing's fans . . .

I've stopped nominating the stallions & just the other day got a call from the Breeder's Cup (no - I'm not special - I'm sure they were calling everyone eligible) reminding me that the deadline for nominating 2009 foals was fast approaching.

So I suspect we're not the only ones who see the Breeder's Cup as it is currently run as irrelevant to our lives & have chosen not to nominate.

majxmom
Grade I Winner
Posts: 1539
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 4:12 pm
Location: Knightsen, CA

Postby majxmom » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:34 pm

These BC people can't stop themselves from shooting themselves in the foot. Every racetrack has a bias of some sort, and if you always have it in the same place, people will self-eliminate their nominations. Dumb!

Not that the same organizations are in charge of the decisions here, but it reminds me that the Cal Cup was originally supposed to rotate between NorCal and SoCal. They cleverly held it the first year at Bay Meadows when no one had ever heard of it, got the usual attendance, and then decreed that the attendance would always be better in SoCal, and there it has stayed.

I wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that there was really a self-enriching deal at hand here, like maybe Magna is paying the BC for the honor.
"When I am on my deathbed, I imagine I will say, 'Thank God I did that'" - Arthur Hancock, on buying back Gato del Sol from Europe after Exceller was killed in a slaughterhouse in Sweden.

zinn21
3rd Year Sire
Posts: 3307
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:23 pm

Postby zinn21 » Tue Mar 30, 2010 4:03 pm

I like the one location idea but the surface uncertainty is a huge negative. With a permanent location in Southern California, you virtually take bad weather off the table.

Here's a thought why not run the entire Breeders Cup card at night under lights? Seems to work fine for the Dubai World Cup.. Running at night would place the event in prime time.

User avatar
diomed
Grade III Winner
Posts: 1142
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 4:16 pm

Postby diomed » Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:29 pm

I am not an owner anymore, but if I was...I wouldn't nominate either.
As a fan and handicapper, I won't watch or wager.
Goodbye BC!!!!

User avatar
bdw0617
Darley line
Posts: 9206
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:19 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Postby bdw0617 » Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:08 pm

i'm split


i was at monouth soak and freaking wet and cold. while i had a good time would have been better in better weather.


while the super bowl does rotate locations they do so using only war weather climents


horse racings only one that they have running tyat tie of year is santa anita.

But, if they do thist, without changing the surface, the BC will be dead in 4 years.
it's not the location that is really pissing people off. it's making dirt racing irrelevant.
"When the solution is simple, God is answering.”
- Einstein

oliverstoned
Restricted Stakes Winner
Posts: 929
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: Florida

Postby oliverstoned » Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:11 pm

I'm out on the nominating. I guess if you're ponying up big bucks for stud fees what the heck but unless they boost the stakes supplements throughout the country it's too much of a long shot. They are going to miss the small breeders nomination fees for the next few years atleast.

Shammy Davis
Chef de Race: Classic
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2004 8:23 am

Postby Shammy Davis » Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:42 pm

Bad Bad Business!

louis finochio
Darley line
Posts: 9181
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 5:21 am
Location: Alhambra-Calif.
Contact:

Postby louis finochio » Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:38 pm

The BC should be run in 3 catagory's, Small Breeders by Stud Fees, Middle, & Big. If those small breeders dont strike paydirt $$, they will pull the plug & they BC will die.

Frank Stronach was shopping around for dirt, but has taken a wait & see attitude. $$ is the big problem, as attendance & handle has taken a big hit.
I support the BC to keep the BC at SA. We have great weather in the fall.
Those without sin cast the first stone.
Louis Finochio

oliverstoned
Restricted Stakes Winner
Posts: 929
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: Florida

Postby oliverstoned » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:03 pm

They need to get back to the original 7 races run at alternating tracks every year. All the new races they made should run for $500,000 each at different tracks throughout the country on Breeders Cup day thus spicing up your hometrack that day. The money saved by running the new races for "only" 500k should be put towards supplementing stakes races during the year.

KBEquine
Grade III Winner
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 12:12 pm

Postby KBEquine » Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:09 pm

oliverstoned wrote:They need to get back to the original 7 races run at alternating tracks every year. All the new races they made should run for $500,000 each at different tracks throughout the country on Breeders Cup day thus spicing up your hometrack that day. The money saved by running the new races for "only" 500k should be put towards supplementing stakes races during the year.


I like that idea.

And bdw - I have to respectfully disagree - it IS the location, as well as the surface. I know Santa Anita is beautiful & I like good weather as much as the next person -- but this isn't just about weather, it's about racing, which needs fans all over, not just in Southern California. Stuffing an important event permanently in the lower lefthand corner of the country does nothing to create new fans in other parts of the nation.

Breeders are asked to pony up a heck of a lot of money just to be told the big event won't ever be anywhere near where they actually race or live.

zinn21
3rd Year Sire
Posts: 3307
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:23 pm

Postby zinn21 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 6:14 am

Wonder if Nominations are down? I used to nominate but decided it was a huge longshot at best. They also eliminated all the local Breeders Cup stakes races.

oliverstoned
Restricted Stakes Winner
Posts: 929
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: Florida

Postby oliverstoned » Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:06 pm

zinn21 wrote:I like the one location idea but the surface uncertainty is a huge negative. With a permanent location in Southern California, you virtually take bad weather off the table.

Here's a thought why not run the entire Breeders Cup card at night under lights? Seems to work fine for the Dubai World Cup.. Running at night would place the event in prime time.


I'm down with Saturday Night Lights....hey I know a nice safe dirt track with lights....