Interesting research from Australia
http://blogs.equisearch.com/horsehealth ... -research/
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Ad ... ne.0015622
Horses Race Faster When Not Being Hit?
Moderators: Roguelet, hpkingjr, WaveMaster
- Patuxet
- Grade III Winner
- Posts: 1150
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:36 pm
- Location: New England & Florida
Horses Race Faster When Not Being Hit?
"He is pure air and fire and the dull elements of earth and water never appear in him; he is indeed a horse ..." Wm. Shakespeare - Henry V
I have always thought that you could make a horse go faster with your voice and by pumping your arms and legs than with a whip. The whip makes them take their mind off of their effort ("Ow! What the hell! I'm trying, can't you see that?") rather than urging them on as a partnership.
However, I don't believe whips should be banned, for safety. To quote Bill Steinkraus, US Olympic gold medalist: If you have it, you usually don't need it, but if you don't have it, sometimes you need it. I think a whip may be necessary to help a jock maintain a straight course.
When England first enacted its rules regarding whipping, where the jock could not exceed some total of whip strikes (maybe it was 8 or so), my first reaction was that there was no way a jock was going to be able to keep the countdown in his head. In the heat of battle, he'd lose count and then there would be a ton of stewards' actions. But I think that system has worked fairly well, and I would support it in the USA. I always hate to see some poor horse obviously giving maximum effort getting repeatedly beaten only for the reason that the jock is in a rhythm.
However, I don't believe whips should be banned, for safety. To quote Bill Steinkraus, US Olympic gold medalist: If you have it, you usually don't need it, but if you don't have it, sometimes you need it. I think a whip may be necessary to help a jock maintain a straight course.
When England first enacted its rules regarding whipping, where the jock could not exceed some total of whip strikes (maybe it was 8 or so), my first reaction was that there was no way a jock was going to be able to keep the countdown in his head. In the heat of battle, he'd lose count and then there would be a ton of stewards' actions. But I think that system has worked fairly well, and I would support it in the USA. I always hate to see some poor horse obviously giving maximum effort getting repeatedly beaten only for the reason that the jock is in a rhythm.
"When I am on my deathbed, I imagine I will say, 'Thank God I did that'" - Arthur Hancock, on buying back Gato del Sol from Europe after Exceller was killed in a slaughterhouse in Sweden.
- wangkw
- Restricted Stakes Winner
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:48 am
- Location: Singapore -- Small, Solid Island In Dictatorship
Use "high tech" whips" .. which will make sound as if coming from a real whip each time the rider swing it past the
horse side...train the horse specifically to respond to the sound... the runner will be DSQ if his whip lands on the
animal.

horse side...train the horse specifically to respond to the sound... the runner will be DSQ if his whip lands on the
animal.

Our Greatest Glory Is Not In Never Falling But In Rising Everytime We Fall
- wangkw
- Restricted Stakes Winner
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:48 am
- Location: Singapore -- Small, Solid Island In Dictatorship
Bdw...it is the culture that is concerned...I am layman in race field..,whipping was not needed thousand years ago as either
horses had better sense of what their rider wanted of them..or they naturally ran much faster then due to the presence of
predators everywhere so riders will fall off their "seats" if they were urged further..Some said the stone age primitives
sprinted 100 meters in 8 seconds...logic is the same.

horses had better sense of what their rider wanted of them..or they naturally ran much faster then due to the presence of
predators everywhere so riders will fall off their "seats" if they were urged further..Some said the stone age primitives
sprinted 100 meters in 8 seconds...logic is the same.

Our Greatest Glory Is Not In Never Falling But In Rising Everytime We Fall
wangkw wrote:Bdw...it is the culture that is concerned...I am layman in race field..,whipping was not needed thousand years ago as either
horses had better sense of what their rider wanted of them..or they naturally ran much faster then due to the presence of
predators everywhere so riders will fall off their "seats" if they were urged further..Some said the stone age primitives
sprinted 100 meters in 8 seconds...logic is the same.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I've seen Quarter horses come back cut up and bleeding after a race. That kind of whip abuse should be lead to some serious discipline. (QH riders also whack horses in the head.)
Horses don't run straight when they are tired. A rider needs a whip of some sort to keep his mount (and others) out of trouble. They don't need a whip capable of leaving welts and cutting the skin.
May 2013: Plan ahead now for the Phalaris/Teddy Centennial!
*****************************
A horse gallops with his lungs
Perseveres with his heart
And wins with his character. --Tesio
*****************************
A horse gallops with his lungs
Perseveres with his heart
And wins with his character. --Tesio