7 new mutations in KIT found, including two more TB DW!!

Talk about equine color, markings, genetics, etc. Post pictures of flashy Thoroughbreds!

Moderators: Roguelet, WaveMaster, Jorge, Sunday Silence

User avatar
summerhorse
Breeder's Cup Winner
Posts: 2178
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:40 am
Location: Panama City, FL
Contact:

Postby summerhorse » Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:58 pm

I don't know, I still take the Bowling study with a grain of salt as from what I remember she did not have photographic evidence of all the "roans".

the Hancock horses are also questionable as they have a mixture of frosty roans (not lethal) and regular roans and probably combinations of both on that page. And that is still a very small number of "homozygous" stallions. I'd lend more credence to the breeders with experience of breeding roan to roan and ending up with 1/3 to 2/3 ratios.

I am glad there seems to be research in this area but until it is published it can't really be considered a scientific source. After publication of course it is different.
Every mighty oak was once an acorn that stood its ground.

Linda_d
Starters Handicap
Posts: 547
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:01 pm
Location: Jamestown, NY

Postby Linda_d » Sun Jan 02, 2011 5:52 am

I would think that the existence of "regular" true roans and "frosty" true roans may very well indicate the existence of 2 different genes or mutations that behave just differently enough that they are not lethal.

Moreover, as I understand the UC Davis testing, they don't actually test for the roan gene but markers for it. Could the same markers be pointing to two different versions of the roan gene?
"you cannot be brilliant if you cannot run" -- bdw0617

User avatar
Pan Zareta
Breeder's Cup Winner
Posts: 2074
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:55 am
Location: west TX boonies

Postby Pan Zareta » Sun Jan 02, 2011 9:43 am

Linda_d wrote:Moreover, as I understand the UC Davis testing, they don't actually test for the roan gene but markers for it.
Correct.

The markers are accurately predictive of roan, but the roan mutation itself has not been identified.
Could the same markers be pointing to two different versions of the roan gene?


They *could* be, yes.

Have any frosty roans been tested and proven to exhibit the same markers used to identify true roan?

Last I heard, the idea that true roan and frosty were controlled by the same gene was unproven but reasonable since frosty is observed only in the same breeds in which true roan occurs.

User avatar
summerhorse
Breeder's Cup Winner
Posts: 2178
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:40 am
Location: Panama City, FL
Contact:

Postby summerhorse » Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:57 pm

Don't know about what controls frosty roan and true roan or how they are related. I think they probably are different genes because of the lethal thing and the distribution pattern.
Every mighty oak was once an acorn that stood its ground.

User avatar
accphotography
Restricted Stakes Winner
Posts: 996
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:03 am

Postby accphotography » Tue Jan 04, 2011 6:29 pm

Frosty roan and true roan are one and the same. Breeding has proven this time and time again.
Image

Image