Stallion heights

Discussion and analysis of thoroughbred stallions.

Moderators: Roguelet, WaveMaster, madelyn

arsvcs
2yo Maiden
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 7:42 pm
Contact:

Stallion heights

Postby arsvcs » Thu Apr 12, 2007 4:28 pm

Can anyone tell me the height of these stallions:

Carson City
Mr. Prospector
Stalwart
Raise A Native
Blushing Groom
Hoist The Flag
Victors Pride
Native Dancer
Nashua
Red God
Nijinsky
Tom Rolfe
Iron Ruler
Impressive
Fleet Nasrullah
Polynesian
Case Ace
Count Fleet
Wild Risk
Northern Dancer
Crozier
Ribot
War Admiral
Never Bend
Prince John
Court Martial
Amerigo

LaTroienne
Restricted Stakes Winner
Posts: 762
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 9:57 pm

Postby LaTroienne » Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:31 pm

War Admiral: 15.3 hh
Northern Dancer: 15.3 hh, according to a source
Blushing Groom: 16 hh
Ribot: 16 hh, approx.
Mr. Prospector - 16 hh
Hoist the Flag: 16.1 hh
Count Fleet: 16 hh
Native Dancer: 16.3 hh

CA Michael
Grade II Winner
Posts: 1258
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 2:32 pm
Location: California

Postby CA Michael » Thu Apr 12, 2007 9:04 pm

Since there is no formal mechanism for determining and reporting actual heights, we're all essentially at the mercy of the person who records it on advertising materials. Few stallion owners with a small horse will understate his size; nor will the owner of a 17.2 horse overstate that fact. I take these numbers with the grain of salt.

Even if Blushing Groom stood on Lyphard's back he wouldn't have reached 16 hands. Northern Dancer's actual has been documented at no taller than 15.1 hands. A giant stallion like *Petrone would likely have stood his advertised 16.2 hands only as a 2yo. Over the years I've shook my head in disbelief many times over the creative license some of these farms have taken in promoting their horses. Until I stand up close to a horse myself do I put much faith in his measurement. Some extremely well balanced horses, like TIZNOW, appear deceivingly small when viewed at some distance; it's only when you get up next to him that you can see just how tall he stands.

Kind of like that warning on the bottom of rear-view mirrors: "Objects may be larger than they appear."

Rokeby Forever
Darley line
Posts: 6684
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:52 pm
Location: Reno, NV

Postby Rokeby Forever » Thu Apr 12, 2007 9:37 pm

Stallion registers always add height to a stallion.

I remember seeing Kelly Kip in the paddock at Belmont. There's no way that he's bigger than 15 hands...but no stallion register will list him as that small.
What synthetics are to California racing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gb0mxcpPOU

User avatar
Kari
Allowance Winner
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Postby Kari » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:38 am

Here's what I found digging thru books at my house:

Blushing Groom 15.3h
Native Dancer 16h 1/2in.
Nashua 16.2
Count Fleet 15.2
Northern Dancer 15 h 1/2 in.
Ribot 15.3-16h

I wonder why that's not listed more often on stallion ads. It would fit right in with the color and the year of birth.

tbrace
Restricted Stakes Winner
Posts: 960
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:52 pm

stallions

Postby tbrace » Fri Apr 13, 2007 7:42 pm

No other group of thoroughbreds are so uniform in their height than are advertised stallions.

They all seem to be "16.1" to "16.3". :)

User avatar
Pete
Grade I Winner
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:24 pm
Location: Huntington, NY

Postby Pete » Sat Apr 14, 2007 6:09 pm

Hi Michael,

Gave me a chuckle and you're on the mark.

How hard is it to 'stick' a stallion to measure his height? To look through the Stallion register you'd think that it was very difficult or considered to be unimportant by the number of missing and incorrect entries.

Kudos to Three Chimneys (and the other farms) who will list heights for all their stallions even when they don't fall into the current fashion such as Rahy @15.1hh and Dynaformer @17.0hh. I get a kick out of how accurate the measurements can be when their stallion is 'nearly' 16.0hh and you see 15.3-3/4hh listed.

The popular range seems to be 15.3hh+ to 16.2hh and I've heard some bizarre excuses why their listed height differed from my own measurements. "The stallion puffs up when you get close to him", I was told in one case. This narrow band (15.3 to 16.2) is similar to saying that all human men are between the height of 5'10" to 6'1".

There's no regulation on what can be listed as a stallion's height so it's buyer beware.

Regards,

Pete
Has a palomino jean that pop up some.
This stallion is DNA ... all foal can be MBNA inrolled.

Horses like their credit cards.
- Four Forty Farms

User avatar
madelyn
Moderator
Posts: 10067
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 1:53 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Postby madelyn » Sun Apr 15, 2007 7:34 am

The funniest one I heard, when the stallion looked smaller than his advertised height, was "he just had his feet trimmed."

Not only looks can be deceiving, so can advertising. That is why I go to see every stallion I ever think of breeding a mare to. I believe the horse in front of me. Not the hype, advertising or spin doctor's version.
So Run for the Roses, as fast as you can.....

griff
Leading Sire
Posts: 3519
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 5:18 pm
Location: Yorktown, VA

Postby griff » Sun Apr 15, 2007 2:47 pm

I have always thought that the dam has more enfluience on a foal's size than the stallion..

griff
"We has met the enemy and he is us" [Pogo]

CA Michael
Grade II Winner
Posts: 1258
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 2:32 pm
Location: California

Postby CA Michael » Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:39 pm

Pete,

Speaking of sticking horses. I pretty much trust my own call on a horse's height if I can walk right up to him. But I enjoy sticking my young horses, beginning about right now, to track their growth. A couple years ago, my young horses' measurements hadn't increased in several months, which I couldn't understand, until I at last realized that the metal tab at the base of the stick had fallen off. So every time I stabilized it during a measurement I was also pushing it into the soil! Amazing I can figure out how to get myself out of bed in the morning.

Gerry
Grade II Winner
Posts: 1254
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 5:28 pm
Location: New York

Postby Gerry » Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:26 pm

griff wrote:I have always thought that the dam has more enfluience on a foal's size than the stallion..

griff



I agree with you Griff. Same stallion, mares are 15h and 17'2.....foals, both colts, both 3rd foals, 15'1 and 16'2 as 2yr olds.

User avatar
Pete
Grade I Winner
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:24 pm
Location: Huntington, NY

Postby Pete » Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:12 pm

Hi Michael,

I hate when the stick falls apart :).

I too (almost always) judge height by eye. I know that I can just see above the withers of a 15.3 horse and simply adjust the difference. The key is to be on level ground.

In the case that I mentioned I'd been measuring young stock with a folding measuring stick and put it in the truck when we went to breed some mares. It's a long story why I was left with the groom and stallion for so long but I got the stick out of the truck and measured him in every direction and he was 17.0hh. I guess he was 'puffed up'?

Regards,

Pete
Has a palomino jean that pop up some.
This stallion is DNA ... all foal can be MBNA inrolled.

Horses like their credit cards.
- Four Forty Farms

User avatar
Derring
Starters Handicap
Posts: 563
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:57 pm

Postby Derring » Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:53 pm

Do you think there are any drawbacks to 17h stallions?
"Animals are such agreeable friends--they ask no questions, they pass no criticisms."
-----George Eliot

CA Michael
Grade II Winner
Posts: 1258
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 2:32 pm
Location: California

Postby CA Michael » Wed Apr 18, 2007 4:09 pm

[quote="griff"]I have always thought that the dam has more enfluience on a foal's size than the stallion..

griff[/quote]


It depends if you're talking to the mare or stallion owner!

I've seen plenty of examples of this, and its opposite, phenomenon to put much faith in it. In my own case, I have several 15.0 hand mares (or less), who have produced big, 16.2 hand horses, and several 16.0 hand mares (or more) who have produced 15.2-3 hand horses--all by the same sire! At the same time, I've noticed that all these foals inherited the thick bone of their sire, irrespective of their dam's contribution.

On Monday, one of my 15.1 hand mares foaled her third foal by this same stallion. According to the farm manager (who's been foaling mares for 35 years) this foal is the biggest he's ever seen. Her head is already at her dam's withers. Her 15.0 hand mother also produced a huge foal by that stallion in January. Yet, a big 16.1 hand mare foaled a less than average size foal, again by the same stallion, last week. In fairness, this was her first foal, which usually are on the smaller side.

As much as it would simplify the breeding selection process, black and white rules about size (and most everything!) are broken on a regular basis.

griff
Leading Sire
Posts: 3519
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 5:18 pm
Location: Yorktown, VA

Postby griff » Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:24 pm

CA Michael

Agree, all rules are made to be broken

I do, however, still content that the mare has more imput on size than the stallion.

breed a mammoth jack to a large cold blood mare and you'll get a strong 16 hh tough, smart, hard working mule.. Breed a large cold blood stallion to a mammoth jenny and you get a very small animal that few would digify with the name mule. .

lastly, it's been my experience that the size of a new born foal has little to nothing to do with how tall they mature.

griff
"We has met the enemy and he is us" [Pogo]