hello Heidilady
Great to see ya

.
Heidilady wrote: FOS wrote:You may have run the quarter (in your crocs

) from six furlongs to a mile faster than Zapster did (25:19)

.
I dunno about you, but I'd pay good money to see someone try to run in crocs with toe grabs.
Toe grabs?

What a visual

.
Heidilady wrote: Hey FOS, long time no chat.

Doesn't Azeri have a chestnut Ghostzapper yearling filly? Given how long it was before her parents got to the top of their game, I'm a tad nervous. If she looks like her mama though, maybe it's a good sign.
Whatever a Ghostzapper out of Azeri looks like, it certainly has two VERY tough acts to follow...WOW
Heidilady wrote:I just scrolled through GZ's 2yos on this database and yup those are some nice mares. I hope he does well, I really do.
So do I. Reality is though...it's mid August, and some of Ghostzapper's connections may be feeling a spasm or two in their guts. Might a cup of Green Tea help...maybe with a shot of Gastrogard

?
Heidilady wrote:Smarty Jones is just now cranking up a bit with a graded winner so they really need to be patient.
Seems to me that, in general, those that supported SJ (with mares, raising foals/yearlings, training, etc) have been very patient, and also offered the dual classic winner an exceptional opportunity. With that in mind, I'm not buying...are you?...that what we've seen of Smarty's disappointing (thus far) first crop is related to impatience...or lack of opportunity.
For what it's worth...seems (to me anyway) that most thoroughbreds (at the time of their conception) sired by stallions that stood for BIG-dollar stud fees (as did both Smarty Jones and Ghostzapper) often receive an extremely generous measure of patience & opportunity.
That's (for starters) why some may find Smarty Jones (as a racehorse sire) to be so EXTREMELY disappointing...
...after all, he stood for $100,000 (some seasons/nominations offered for a measly

$70k) and was bred to a quality book of mares that owners were apparently willing to sink BIG-dollars into. Very simply...Smarty Jones was offered a BIG opportunity, and likely many (if not most) of his sons and daughters were the beneficiaries of a
whatever-it-takes (including
patience) attitude. All Things Considered...is it unreasonable to suggest that Smarty Jones' first crop did little, if anything, to fuel confidence in/enthusiasm for Smarty the racehorse sire?
As for Ghostzapper...he too was offered a BIG opportunity. Will his first crop (2yos of 2009) outperform SJ's first crop (2yos of 2008)? Who knows; but even though SJ didn't set the bar very high (thus far anyway) with his first crop runners...Ghostzapper certainly isn't
knockin' 'em dead; not yet anyway. Patience...patience.
Bottom line...is it unreasonable to suggest that there may be a correlation between the Quality and Quantity of Opportunity afforded a stallion, and the measure/level/degree of patience (or lack therof) afforded the resultant offspring and/or the sire himself?
Thoughts?
Best.
Respectfully