darby dan
Moderators: Roguelet, WaveMaster, madelyn
-
da hossman
- Allowance Winner
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:08 am
- Location: KY
-
oliverstoned
- Restricted Stakes Winner
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:17 pm
- Location: Florida
C'mon hoss way too harsh on Nobiz. I know alot people don't like the Cormorant line but he did damn good for being in NY, a Derby winner, Champion 3yo Filly and host of other graded winners. Albert the Great ain't much of a sire but thats ok because like in humans sometimes talent skips a generation. Nobiz was always said to be quite nice physically. Biggest thing going against him is Darby Dan and their quest for large books at the expense of quality.
Okay, I'll bite ..... I have a mare in foal to No Biz. Loved him and loved him with my mare. Was I ticked they dropped his fee? Not as much as those folks that saw their mares in foal to stallions whose fees went from $150,000 to $50,000 or from $100,000 to $10,000
Am I sorry I bred to him .... nope!
"We are the people our parents warned us about" - Jimmy Buffett
"My occupational hazard is that my occupation is just not around" - Jimmy Buffett
"My occupational hazard is that my occupation is just not around" - Jimmy Buffett
-
oliverstoned
- Restricted Stakes Winner
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:17 pm
- Location: Florida
-
oliverstoned
- Restricted Stakes Winner
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:17 pm
- Location: Florida
CS wrote:oliverstoned wrote:Darby Dan and their quest for large books at the expense of quality.
What is your definition of a "large book" - 100 mares? Really?
What is an acceptable CI or CPI for stallions in the $5-$10K range?
For Nobiz at 7500 I am willing to bet they weren't very descriminating as who got in his book which I agree is the norm for commercial breeding farms these days. The slight at Darby Dan was mostly directed at what I have seen at the auctions sired by or infoal to Suave and Sun King (150 mares?) where after they go for peanuts you scratch your head and think what were they thinking? In answer to your question really?, yes really.
-
da hossman
- Allowance Winner
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:08 am
- Location: KY
Hey Oliver, I know Nobiz was one heckuva racehorse, and my quick comment could have been delivered more diplomatically. But if I am going to spend $10 or less on a stallion these days, I am going with proven stallions or unproven horses by fashionable sires. Unless you get an outstanding individual your chances of breaking even (forget making a profit) are slim and none with an unproven, inexpensive horse by an unfashionable and failed stallion (Albert).
Now if you are considering an unproven horse by a fashionable sire, you have a chance....
Now if you are considering an unproven horse by a fashionable sire, you have a chance....
A difference of opinion is what makes horse racing and missionaries.
Will Rogers
Will Rogers
Hey da hossman, I have a question for you - would you say the same applies to a broodmare? In other words, if I have a mare by a proven, fashionable sire but her page is weak, is she worth taking a chance on in the breeding shed rather than a broodmare who has a good page, but is by an unproven, unfashionable sire?
-
oliverstoned
- Restricted Stakes Winner
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:17 pm
- Location: Florida
Your opinion on Magna Graduate
Is Magna Graduate priced right or is there a much better vlaue at $5,000?
- geowarrior
- Leading Sire
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:45 pm
- Location: Spokane, WA
Well, Magna Graduate was certainly a nice racehorse and I like durability. I'd be interested to see what others have to say about him re. female family and conformation. Just from my viewpoint looking at his race record and page and comparing with a couple of other new sires he might be a tad overpriced.