Giacomo and Tiago
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 10:46 am
Forum
https://www.pedigreequery.com:443/forum/
https://www.pedigreequery.com:443/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=33013
Barcaldine wrote:Tiago was in New York. He bred only one mare in 2012 due to sickness or injury. Remember, too, both these horses are owned by Frank Stronach, who is well known for his capricious changes of heart.
bdw0617 wrote:Barcaldine wrote:Tiago was in New York. He bred only one mare in 2012 due to sickness or injury. Remember, too, both these horses are owned by Frank Stronach, who is well known for his capricious changes of heart.
are you sure about that? Stronach OWNS both of them? those are moss horses, I'm nto saying you are wrong i'm just saying that would seem odd. You would think that the mosses are the type that would not actually sale a horse to a farm upon retirement.
I figured Stronach had some type of breeding deal to stand the horses i did not know he owned them outright. In fact I assumed it was the mosses that wanted the horses in CA in the first place
Havent you heard? California's breeding industry has been in a nosedive for years with no rescue in sight. The Jockey Club estimates that only 1600 foals were dropped in CA this year, the lowest number since I was a kid in the 1960's. And yearling prices are about on par with those 30 years ago. Most good mares have left for Kentucky and other states, and the stallion roster is without question the weakest I've ever seen. The best horses are Unusual Heat (22 years), and a number of KY castoffs (like Giacomo, whose owner found his reception there so underwhelming that he's back in the bluegrass.)
So, declines in quantity and quality of better-class bloodstock are creating a vacuum from which there is little chance of escape.
Self-serving and out-of-touch "leaders" have precipitated California's downfall by, first, denying any problems in the industry; second, taking a nap while straddling the fence on major issues; and third, assigning blame to each other instead of taking responsibility for their dire lack of innovations.
Frankly, that's why I moved to Kentucky. For all its problems, it's far easier to make a good living here in the horse business than in California. It's clear as can be that the CA breeding industry is on it's way to the history books; I predict that within 10 years only five to 10 big breeders (meaning subsidized from family businesses) will monopolize the politics and the market. The little guy has little chance to make it, unless he's just in it for fun. The days of selling horse farms for housing developments is all but over, so the smaller breeders can't console themselves with the fact that they lost money in horses but made it up on the sale of their acreage.
And that, IMO, is why stallions like GIACOMO arent sufficiently patronized. (BTW, another KY transplant HEATSEEKER bred only 51 mares there too). It's a very sad state of affairs.
zinn21 wrote:Barcaldine wrote:Havent you heard? California's breeding industry has been in a nosedive for years with no rescue in sight. The Jockey Club estimates that only 1600 foals were dropped in CA this year, the lowest number since I was a kid in the 1960's. And yearling prices are about on par with those 30 years ago. Most good mares have left for Kentucky and other states, and the stallion roster is without question the weakest I've ever seen. The best horses are Unusual Heat (22 years), and a number of KY castoffs (like Giacomo, whose owner found his reception there so underwhelming that he's back in the bluegrass.)
So, declines in quantity and quality of better-class bloodstock are creating a vacuum from which there is little chance of escape.
Self-serving and out-of-touch "leaders" have precipitated California's downfall by, first, denying any problems in the industry; second, taking a nap while straddling the fence on major issues; and third, assigning blame to each other instead of taking responsibility for their dire lack of innovations.
Frankly, that's why I moved to Kentucky. For all its problems, it's far easier to make a good living here in the horse business than in California. It's clear as can be that the CA breeding industry is on it's way to the history books; I predict that within 10 years only five to 10 big breeders (meaning subsidized from family businesses) will monopolize the politics and the market. The little guy has little chance to make it, unless he's just in it for fun. The days of selling horse farms for housing developments is all but over, so the smaller breeders can't console themselves with the fact that they lost money in horses but made it up on the sale of their acreage.
And that, IMO, is why stallions like GIACOMO arent sufficiently patronized. (BTW, another KY transplant HEATSEEKER bred only 51 mares there too). It's a very sad state of affairs.
I think you are 100% correct unfortunately. The high costs and low purses especially in NorCal are killing the game.