Triple Crown Victory a Dealbreaker?

Discussion and analysis of thoroughbred stallions.

Moderators: Roguelet, WaveMaster, madelyn

austique
Grade I Winner
Posts: 1734
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 3:10 pm

Triple Crown Victory a Dealbreaker?

Postby austique » Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:19 pm

My dad and I were discussing stallions and came upon the fact that winning a Triple Crown race hasn't exactly translated to stallion sucess for a lot of horses recently (Lil E Tee, Sea Hero, Strike the Gold , Editor's Note, Hansel, Bet Twice (what happened to him?)) Okay I could keep listing forever, but does anybody have a theory as to why this is? I mean FUPEG is the only recent one I can think of that has done okay and maybe Monarchos (although its a little early to evaluate). Some of them you can mark down to unfashionable breeding, but what about the others? :?

User avatar
FOS
Freshman Sire
Posts: 2816
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 1:44 pm

Postby FOS » Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:56 pm

hi austique

What about Seattle Slew...you might agree...not bad.

Respectfully

austique
Grade I Winner
Posts: 1734
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 3:10 pm

Postby austique » Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:06 pm

Oh don't get me wrong some of them have been succesful but for every Seattle Slew or Easy Goer there's like five Gato Del Sol's. Also, I was thinking like '80's and up which I forgot to clarify. I mean you can make a case for all three Triple Crown winners in the 1970's as having been solid sires.

Sam
Chef de Race: Intermediate
Posts: 4194
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:51 pm

Re: Triple Crown Victory a Dealbreaker?

Postby Sam » Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:58 pm

austique wrote:Bet Twice (what happened to him?))

Died a few years ago