Page 1 of 1

Triple Crown Victory a Dealbreaker?

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:19 pm
by austique
My dad and I were discussing stallions and came upon the fact that winning a Triple Crown race hasn't exactly translated to stallion sucess for a lot of horses recently (Lil E Tee, Sea Hero, Strike the Gold , Editor's Note, Hansel, Bet Twice (what happened to him?)) Okay I could keep listing forever, but does anybody have a theory as to why this is? I mean FUPEG is the only recent one I can think of that has done okay and maybe Monarchos (although its a little early to evaluate). Some of them you can mark down to unfashionable breeding, but what about the others? :?

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:56 pm
by FOS
hi austique

What about Seattle Slew...you might agree...not bad.

Respectfully

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:06 pm
by austique
Oh don't get me wrong some of them have been succesful but for every Seattle Slew or Easy Goer there's like five Gato Del Sol's. Also, I was thinking like '80's and up which I forgot to clarify. I mean you can make a case for all three Triple Crown winners in the 1970's as having been solid sires.

Re: Triple Crown Victory a Dealbreaker?

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:58 pm
by Sam
austique wrote:Bet Twice (what happened to him?))

Died a few years ago