oliverstoned said:
.... if I'm forking over 10-15K for unproven studs I'm expecting some success, ....
Of course you're hoping for some success but the key word in this statement is
unproven. The 'unproven' stud - at any stud fee - is a gamble on the stallion's ability to pass on in the breeding shed what in his racing performance made him worth putting to the shed in the first place. His pedigree (illustrious ancestors' and their ability to pass on their greatness), his physical aspect: conformation and mechanics, the quality and quantity of mares he'll have supporting him early in his career AND the commitment level of his connections in supporting him beyond his first foal crop, at the sales and thru the training of his first two crops to race are all factors to take into consideration. This is because you're not just 'betting' the stud fee but also a productive year of your mare's life plus the carrying cost of your mare, then the cost of raising this foal to the point where you expect/plan on recouping your investment let alone making a profit whether that's in utero at a breeding stock sale within the year, as a weanling at a Mixed Sale a little over a year later, as a yearling at one of the sales two years after the breeding or 2+ years down the road at a 2YO in training sale or on the track. Even when the stallion's early foals/crops generate interest at the sales you have to hope that your foal is born healthy and vigorous, stays that way throughout his/her development, is correct of limb and has a free fluid action/way of going, inherits the best of physical attributes from dam and sire and perhaps that his or her dam's catalog page improves a bit along the way to have any hope of gaining the 'top sale price' numbers that are announced regularly but in no way represent the average for most stallions/sires.
That's a heck of a lot of "IFs" to be trying to control and invoke when contemplating a mating.
Presumabally the higher stud fees for unproven stallions represent individuals that excel in all the categories above: an imposing physical aspect, excellent mechanics and a powerful quick way of going with a top drawer MGSW race career to indicate that he has 'heart' as well as talent, an excellent pedigree top and bottom - especially looked for is a female family with a history of producing top sires, temperment that suggests his get may be readily trained as youngsters, and the support by his connections with broodmares of sufficient quality and quantity that you should have some meaningful feedback from his first crop/crops to hit the sales and the tracks. BIRDSTONE is a sire who was not physically imposing himself and he proved early on that he tended to pass on his lack of size so no help for his image/numbers at the sales there. He was a stallion/sire that did not come from a highly sought after, particularlly well thought of sire - albeit he was a Derby winner and a son of a Derby winner. Finally - being the winner of the Belmont race, alone of the three classics, doesn't necessarily cause breeders to flock to your door even if they believe you can pass on your stamina because unless there's some hope for early maturity and some speed in the mating contemplated the fear is you may be breeding a horse that is best suited for a length of course that hardly exists anymore in this country yet isn't very likely to be a turfer for the European venues. It is to BIRDSTONE's credit that he is showing he has the ability to pass on classic wining capabilities in spite of often passing on an unpreposessing size. His offspring have shown some real heart at the highest levels of competition in addition to raw talent of the sort desired. It is also to his connections' credit - they have supported him with the sort of mares and the ability to select for such mares via the attractiveness of their initially rather modest fee among those interested that gave him a chance to demonstrate he is the real deal as a sire capable of producing the legendary and much hoped for 'big horse' and to do so more than once in a blue moon.