hi Rok
I wouldn't argue that some criticism re trainer D Wayne Lukas is not deserved...but I would argue that he is deserving some acknowledgement and some credit for what he has, and horses he's trained have, accomplished.
Very simply, seems to me your dishing out plenty of venom...but, little or no credit...and arguably Lukas is entitled to some credit. Come on Rok...how about a little love

.
For some historical perspective (if it doesn't put you to sleep

)...I first met Lukas after Albert Yank (in Cal) decided to deliver Effervescing to D Wayne (to train). For what it's worth, D Wayne seemed to be laid-back, somewhat preppy (you know, the starched khakis thing) and was definitely well-pressed (you know, the sharp creases thing). He seemed to be a good listener and a soft-spoken communicator (although he had a commanding clear-as-a-bell tone about him) with what I would describe as a professional way about him. Furthermore...he had an ability to say exactly what he meant while using relatively few words to make his point. At the same time, he came across as inclusive...not exclusive. Overall, his style and personna seemed appealing and refreshing (to me anyway).
Fast forward...Lukas arguably did better than good with Effervescing, and was credited with winning at a very high level with the colt that Yank delivered to him. Voila...Lukas' early success, coupled with his appeal, attracted a swarm of prospective owners...with lots of money. Lukas was launched.
Yes D Wayne has his detractors...but I for one would argue that Lukas has accomplished plenty, not only for himself but ALSO for many owners. I also understand that he's likely to be held responsible/accountable for his actions, including what might be described as his failings and/or shortcomings. Fair enough.
As for his strengths...among them I would submit that Lukas could certainly select a quality racing prospect...and he (and his crew) could target a race and get a horse ready to deliver a top performance (if not career-best) when the big chips were up for grabs. Arguably...those days might be long gone, but he (and Team Lukas) did it oh-so-many-times for years.
I would also submit that Lukas became a media favorite who was not only a well-spoken and often interesting if not captivating interview, but that he also positively affected (in general) the public's perception of and interest in thoroughbred horseracing. I see that as another Lukas strength.
All things consdered...I would suggest that to exclude any positive impact and/or influence that D Wayne Lukas had on the thoroughbred racing game, not to mention his accomplishments and those of many horses he trained (for a multitude of owners), is not only unfair, but also unacceptable...at least from my perspective.
Best to you.
Respectfully