New colour Status in the UK PAINTED

Talk about equine color, markings, genetics, etc. Post pictures of flashy Thoroughbreds!

Moderators: Roguelet, WaveMaster, Jorge, Sunday Silence

User avatar
angrovestud
Allowance Winner
Posts: 391
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:33 am
Location: North Yorkshire England
Contact:

New colour Status in the UK PAINTED

Postby angrovestud » Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:22 am

Just got Notification from Weatherbys GSB that our mare whatablaze has had her passport changed to Painted as she has large white belly splashes and white roaning all over her coat she is the first adult horse to be changed in the UK the new rule came about in 2008.

A quote from Weatherbys Chief Executive.

‘ In 2008 the International Stud Book Committee (ISBC), which represents the 67 Approved Thoroughbred Stud Books worldwide, decided to add the colour description ‘ painted ‘ to those ISBC Members use to record thoroughbred foals. This decision was made in recognition of the growing number of thoroughbred bloodlines, mainly coming out of the USA, which produce foals which exhibit white markings on their bodies and not just on their head and limbs which is commonly the case. In due course therefore the description ‘ painted ‘ will appear in racecards but in the meantime the Angroves Stud has asked for the colour description of their mare Whatablaze to be altered to ‘ painted ‘. Her passport is currently being changed and our official database updated.’



Paul Greeves, Chief Executive, Weatherbys Thoroughbred Limited.
A coloured leaving its mark
Angrove stud breeding your racing colours

I am dyslexic it can be funny!
Image

User avatar
Jorge
Moderator
Posts: 6234
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:48 pm

Postby Jorge » Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:11 am

Interestingly logical. :idea:

User avatar
summerhorse
Breeder's Cup Winner
Posts: 2178
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:40 am
Location: Panama City, FL
Contact:

Postby summerhorse » Thu Jun 04, 2009 1:25 pm

Amazing!
Every mighty oak was once an acorn that stood its ground.

reedhill
Grade III Winner
Posts: 1091
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:08 am

Postby reedhill » Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:10 pm

Ok, so if the UK can add "painted" to a registration cert. and passport, is the USA going to identify our sabino's better? I sure hope so. Right now I'm working with Keeneland about putting something on my two "sabino " yearling's catalog pages that sets them apart from solid yearlings. HELIODORIS is regist. white, no prob there. Just as palomino has now debuted in the sale ring, sabino's need identified too. My ALLA AURORA and ART IN MOTION are registered chestnut and bay and will appear in the catalog as such unless I push to get something added.
http://www.geocities.com/rhftn02/Mystiquesfoals.html

By the way, thank you for the update, this may help me.

color
Allowance Winner
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 9:28 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Postby color » Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:08 pm

Is this still correct to call the whites Sabinos? I understood they are dominant white and NOT Sabino.
http://www.gestuet-falkenhorst.com
Exceptional colored German WBs, TBs and Arabs

User avatar
RiddleMeThis
Allowance Winner
Posts: 371
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:28 am

Postby RiddleMeThis » Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:38 am

color wrote:Is this still correct to call the whites Sabinos? I understood they are dominant white and NOT Sabino.
Some are dominant white, some are sabinos.

If the horse comes from a line of dominant white, no I do not think its correct to call them sabino any more.

However if it is unknown whether or not they are dominant white (AA line for example) then i think its ok for them to be called sabino.

User avatar
Jorge
Moderator
Posts: 6234
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:48 pm

Postby Jorge » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:37 pm

Oh my goodness, I encountered this very same dilemma when writing my work on whites. Since that time, the topic has evolved into a bigger "quaere" prognosis. :shock:

User avatar
angrovestud
Allowance Winner
Posts: 391
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:33 am
Location: North Yorkshire England
Contact:

Postby angrovestud » Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:45 am

To anwser the question you should now be able to register your foals as painted if they have any white on the bodies it does not matter if the patten is Sabino/ splash/ frame/ white/stained or otherwise even our tobianos are going to be allowed in the GSB after we breed 6 more generations of tobiano to pure TB's.
painted means the door is truly open
A coloured leaving its mark

Angrove stud breeding your racing colours



I am dyslexic it can be funny!

Image

BlazingColours
Allowance Winner
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:20 pm
Location: Southern Ontario
Contact:

Postby BlazingColours » Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:53 am

That is great.

As far as the DW vs a Sabino. I think that calling all the Puchi/Sato line horses DW is going to make no sense to 90% of the buying public. They just do not know what that is yet. So I will still continue to call all my sabino marked horses, sabinos. I will explain to those interested, that they are actually DW but it will take time before more than 50% of the buying public will understand that term. Thoughts?
Living life for the journey, not the destination.
Join us on FACEBOOK

Evenheaven
Allowance Winner
Posts: 315
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:13 am
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Contact:

Postby Evenheaven » Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:45 am

Blazing colours, I would agree with you in that the dominate white "label" is just too new for most to understand. When I tried explaining it to my vet, she just looked at me with the "I don't get it look."
"Every little girl deserves a horse"
http://www.freewebs.com/evenheaven

User avatar
SpecialEffects
Maiden Special Weight
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 9:06 pm
Location: West Lincoln, Ontario
Contact:

Postby SpecialEffects » Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:30 pm

It should be interesting to watch the changes.... one step at a time.

xfactor fan
Breeder's Cup Winner
Posts: 2212
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:46 pm

Postby xfactor fan » Thu Jun 11, 2009 5:47 pm

Actually adding Painted as a color designation would solve a whole lot of problems, hope the US Jockey club adopts this too.

User avatar
Jorge
Moderator
Posts: 6234
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:48 pm

Postby Jorge » Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:54 pm

The only negative point I see against applying the "Painted" nomenclature ALONE is that it has the effect of wrapping-up under a single designation two historical cornerstone coat colors, namely, the "chestnuts" and the "bays". All for the sake of trying to me a little more descriptive.

I would suggest instead applying the terms "painted bay" (pt. b.) and "painted chestnut" (pt. ch.), etc.

But my original suggestion was to officially establish the use of the terms "marked bay" (mk. b.) and "marked chestnut" (mk. ch.), etc.

User avatar
angrovestud
Allowance Winner
Posts: 391
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:33 am
Location: North Yorkshire England
Contact:

Postby angrovestud » Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:30 am

Jorge
I have not got my passport back from weatherbys yet but I would assume that the painted then bay would be there. as soon Weatherbys are hanging on to Whatablaze's passport to register her as a broodmare as she due to foal this month i asked them to keep it.
I will check weatherbys stallions on line i was framed as he is now described as painted but I did not notice weather bay was still there.
A coloured leaving its mark

Angrove stud breeding your racing colours



I am dyslexic it can be funny!

Image

User avatar
Jorge
Moderator
Posts: 6234
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:48 pm

Postby Jorge » Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:41 am

Angrovestud,

Thank you so much for keeping us informed. This is a very interesting matter and this updated information is quite useful and trend setting. Hmmm, would like to know how Weatherbys would analize a "champagne" Thoroughbred, if there is such a case ( :D ) as alleged on another thread here.