ct2346 wrote:Patuxet wrote:Statistics released just last week by The Jockey Club revealed that for the third straight year thoroughbred racing on synthetic surfaces resulted in a lower equine fatality rate than dirt racing. The fatality rate on synthetic surfaces was 1.09 per 1,000 starts last year, compared with 2.07 per 1,000 starts on dirt. Races conducted on turf had a fatality rate of 1.53 per 1,000 starts in 2011 from 50,362 races run.
http://www.jockeyclub.com/mediaCenter.asp?story=546
reenci: Please share with us the sources of the science that supports your observations.
Thanks!
Allison
I speculate (note, not cite as facts) whether the number of synthetic tracks, and their presence in the higher end racing centers, have something to do with the disparity between the 1.09 vs 2.07 rates cited. I don't know for a fact, but wonder whether because Chicago, Toronto, LA, and Keeneland are the ones holding synthetic meets (for higher purses?) that there is another factor at work behind that delta. IOTW, if lesser centers with smaller purses, had synthetic surfaces, would the delta hold? Perhaps if purse amounts could in some way work into the analysis a truer guide could occur.
Turfway is not high end. This past meet they have had an excellent safety record-one fatality.